Showing posts with label John Colet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Colet. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Latin Education after the English Reformation

First Things magazine hosted an event last week that I hope results in an article in a later issue: a presentation by Eleanor Pettus Schneider titled A Hole in the Renaissance: The Decline in Latin Education During the English Reformation:

By 1535, England had a robust and growing number of Latin grammar schools that aspired to teach some form of humanist Latin. The very reason for the early spread of humanist ideas, however, nearly proved the downfall of the Latin education in general and the educational fashion with it. Pre-Reformation English humanism had proven itself to be entirely compatible with late medieval religious beliefs about the role of intercessory prayers in the life of the church; schools founded by humanists maintained traditional expectations about the role of school as religious organization. Thus, when Henry VIII and Edward VI attempted to reform the church and stamp out practices they regarded as superstitious many schools vanished with the institutions that had been outlawed.

This presentation is based on Eleanor Pettus Schneider's 2015 dissertation for her PhD at the University of Notre Dame. She does not use the term, but I presume she is discussing in part the suppression of the Chantry Chapels which combined grammar schools for the poor and chapels for praying for the dead and offering Masses for the repose of their souls.

In her interview on the National Association of Scholars website, she explains some more about her research and what she wants to do next with a scholarship she had received:

How will the Fraser Barron Scholarship help you do your research?

Looking at more individual schools. Many of my conclusions are guided by large document sets—the returns of the Henry VIII and Edward VI chantry commissions, the surrenders of the monasteries, and the Latin grammar publication records. But these documents need to be fleshed out through more local stories— individual school fights for survival. The Fraser Barron will let me visit three such institutions.

What excites you about your research?

I love teasing out the definition of “education”. What made Renaissance society invest so heavily in their schools? How did they understand the connection between education and the soul? The scholar and the community? And how did the Tudor government so misunderstand the actual school endowment structures that Reformation-era legislation threatened the whole project?

I wonder how John Colet's humanist curriculum survived at St. Paul's School? Did his Latin grammar, written with Erasmus and William Lily, endure the neglect that Schneider saw in the publication of other Latin grammar books?

Image Credit: John Colet, Dean of St. Paul's (public domain the USA)

Saturday, September 10, 2011

John Colet, Dean of St. Paul's

John Colet, Dean of St. Paul's died on September 10, 1519. He was a friend of St. Thomas More and of Desiderius Erasmus, a humanist reformer of Catholicism. He also founded St. Paul's School with funds from his inheritance.

Colet was born in 1467 in London and took his MA at Magdalen College in Oxford. His father Sir Henry Colet served twice as Lord Mayor of London and left him very comfortably well off.

After studying in France and Italy he returned to Oxford and lectured on the epistles of St. Paul, eschewing scholastic method.

While he influenced Erasmus, he was influenced by the great Dominican friar, Girolamo Savonarola.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, William Warham, called upon Colet to preach to the Convocation of his diocese in 1512. He called upon the priests gathered there to reform their lives, to be humble, to serve their people by prayer, preaching, and teaching, and providing examples to their people of true Christian lives.

Colet also preached rather bravely before King Henry VIII opposing England's war with France in 1513.

As a humanist reformer, Colet is often claimed as a proto-Protestant and yet even as he said in the 1512 Convocation sermon, no new laws or regulations needed to be passed; the clergy of his day just needed to follow the Church's own teaching and reforming efforts to become better priests and servants of the people.